Home Appliances Product Studies Haier 190L Refrigerator

Refrigerator Should Cost Analysis & Teardown Teardown & Cost Analysis

Teardown and should cost analysis analysis of a Haier Direct Cool 190 Ltr (2-Star) single-door refrigerator. ~500 parts analyzed with estimated should-cost of ?10,222.20 per unit.

October 2024 18 min read
Refrigerator
Exploded View
Inside Layout
[Image 1 Caption]
1 / 3
Independent Study Notice: This study was conducted entirely in-house by ASI Engineering. The product was independently procured. No proprietary or confidential information from any other party has been used. Results reflect the date of publication and are not updated thereafter.
Study Summary
Refrigerator 190L ? Teardown & Cost Analysis ? ~500 Parts ? Should Cost ?10,222
What We Studied

This study presents a teardown and refrigerator should cost analysis analysis of a Haier Direct Cool 190 Ltr (2-Star) single-door model, carried out by ASI Engineering with xcPEP to evaluate its design, materials, and manufacturing economics.

Why It Was Done

Refrigerators are among the most widely produced and cost-sensitive appliances, making cost transparency essential for manufacturers and procurement teams worldwide. Total estimated should-cost: ?10,222.20 per unit at 40,000 units/year.

Product Brief

Direct Cool Technology, EKZ60K fixed-speed reciprocating compressor (220---240V, 50Hz), R600a refrigerant, 190L total capacity, 14L freezer with Diamond Edge Technology, toughened glass shelves, manual defrost with drain water collector.

What You'll Learn

Assembly-wise weight distribution, part count distribution by manufacturing category, weight distribution by manufacturing category, bought-out parts analysis, detailed should cost analysis with raw material/process/overhead breakdown.

Outcomes ?10,222 Should Cost ~500 Part BOM Cooling Cycle Analysis
Methodology & Scope
Complete Teardown ? 10000+ pts ? xcPEP v4.2 ? xcPROC India
Product
Haier 190L Refrigerator
Teardown
Mechanical & Electrical
Data Points
500+
Images
500+
Weight
33.42 kg
Assumed Vol.
40K/yr
Should Cost Analysis Platform
Zero-Based Product Cost Intelligence
v4.2
Processes [Process 1] [Process 2] [Process 3]
Cost Models [Cost Model 1] [Cost Model 2]
Should CostData
City and Time Specific CostData
2025 Q1
Region [Country - City/State]
Includes Machine Rates Labor Rates Material Prices Overhead Factors Logistics

01Features & Specifications

Introduction

Refrigerators are among the most widely produced and cost-sensitive appliances, making cost transparency essential for manufacturers and procurement teams worldwide. This study presents a teardown and refrigerator should cost analysis analysis of a Haier Direct Cool 190 Ltr (2-Star) single-door model, carried out by ASI Engineering with xcPEP to evaluate its design, materials, and manufacturing economics.

Direct Cool Technology

The refrigerator uses Direct Cool technology for its cooling operation. It relies on natural convection, meaning there is no fan to circulate air. This results in lower energy consumption and minimal noise during operation. The defrosting process is manual and can be activated using a push-button, requiring periodic user intervention to remove frost buildup.

Direct Cool
Thermal
Direct Cool Technology Overview

Compressor Specifications

The EKZ60K is a fixed-speed reciprocating compressor operating on a 220---240V, 50 Hz single-phase supply. It uses R600a (Isobutane) refrigerant and has a Locked Rotor Amps (LRA) rating of 7.1A. Its approximate cooling capacity is 600---700 BTU/h, ideal for small direct cool refrigerators.

Compressor
Engineering
EKZ60K Reciprocating Compressor

Capacity & Internal Layout

The refrigerator has a total capacity of 190 litres, organized into several compartments. It features a 14-litre freezer with Diamond Edge Technology for efficient ice formation and an 11.5-litre vegetable case covered with a lid measuring 415 235 mm for moisture retention. The main chamber includes two toughened glass shelves, each with a surface area of approximately 145,000 mm, and four door shelves for bottles and condiments. Additionally, it has a chiller tray with a maximum area of 428 338 mm.

Capacity
Specifications
190 Litres Capacity Layout
Rating
Specifications
Energy Efficiency Rating
Accessories
Interior
Internal Accessories & Shelving
Packaging
Logistics
Product Packaging

Defrost Water Collection System

The refrigerator includes a defrost water collection system (Defrosted ice water collector) to prevent water accumulation inside the cabinet. When manual defrosting is performed, the melted ice flows down to the chiller tray, passes through a drain funnel, and is finally collected in a 3-litre water collector located at the rear.

Drain Collector
Mechanics
Chiller Drain Water Collector System

02Cooling Cycle & Compressor

Working of Refrigerator: Cooling Cycle Explained

Below is a detailed breakdown of its design, performance, energy usage, and functional specifications:

If the refrigerator door is open, the door switch closes, turning on the lamp to illuminate the compartment. If the door is closed, the door switch opens and the lamp turns off.

The full cooling cycle operates as follows:

  1. Power Supply: Power is supplied through the plug connected to the AC mains (black = live, red = neutral, green/yellow = earth)
  2. Door Switch Operation: If the door is open, the switch closes and turns on the lamp. If closed, the lamp turns off
  3. Thermostat Operation: Monitors internal temperature; remains open when cooling is not needed
  4. Relay and Start Capacitor: When temperature rises above set point, thermostat closes, relay connects start winding and capacitor to assist motor start
  5. Refrigerant Compression: Compressor compresses low-pressure gas from evaporator into high-pressure, high-temperature gas
  6. Condensation: Hot gas flows through condenser coils, releases heat, and condenses into liquid
  7. Pressure Drop: Liquid refrigerant passes through capillary tube, pressure and temperature drop significantly
  8. Evaporation: Cold, low-pressure refrigerant enters evaporator coil and evaporates by absorbing heat from inside
  9. Refrigerant Returns: Low-pressure gas returns to compressor to begin cycle again
  10. Cycle Control: Thermostat opens when desired temperature is reached, stopping compressor
Working
Thermal
Complete Refrigerator Working Diagram
Cycle Diagram
Thermal
Refrigeration Cycle Diagram
Evaporator
Thermal Design
Evaporator Routing Layout

Compressor Working Principle

When the fridge temperature rises above the set point, the thermostat closes, allowing power to flow to the compressor circuit. The relay is energized and temporarily connects the start winding and capacitor to assist in starting the compressor motor. The start capacitor provides a phase shift, helping the compressor motor generate enough torque to start. Once the motor reaches sufficient speed, the relay automatically disconnects the start winding, and the compressor continues to run on the main winding alone.

When the fridge temperature rises above the set point, the thermostat closes, allowing 220---240V AC to power the single-phase motor inside the compressor.

The stator generates a rotating magnetic field that spins the rotor (2. Rotor Starts Rotating) ( 51.5 mm), initiating the compressor cycle.

The rotor motion drives the crankshaft (121.5 mm long), converting rotary motion into reciprocating motion through the connecting rod (52.6 mm).

Suction Stroke (Downstroke)

The crankshaft pulls the piston (4. Piston Moves Downward) ( 21.1 mm) down inside the cylinder (87.8 mm height), increasing chamber volume and reducing internal pressure.

The pressure drop causes the suction reed valve (0.2 mm thick) to open, allowing low-pressure R600a refrigerant to enter the chamber.

Refrigerant flows in through the suction muffler (26.42 mm thick), which dampens intake noise and vibrations.

As the crankshaft rotates, it agitates the oil pool at the bottom. The motion splashes oil onto the piston skirt, cylinder walls, crankshaft, and connecting rod.

Oil forms a lubricating film between the piston and cylinder, reducing friction, sealing against leakage, and minimizing heat and wear.

Suction Stroke
Engineering
Compressor Suction Stroke Workflow

Compression Stroke (Upstroke)

The crankshaft pushes the piston upward (9. Piston Moves Upward), decreasing chamber volume and increasing pressure.

The rising pressure forces the suction valve to close, preventing backflow.

The refrigerant vapor is compressed into high-pressure, high-temperature gas suitable for heat rejection in the condenser.

Once internal pressure exceeds that of the discharge line, the discharge reed valve (0.18 mm thick) opens.

Compressed gas exits via the discharge muffler ( 22.31 mm), which smooths out pulsations and reduces discharge noise. A 3 mm valve plate (14. Valves Controlled by Valve Plate) and 1.76 mm backing plate guide and limit reed valve motion, ensuring timely opening/closing based on pressure changes.

With each rotation, oil continues circulating, maintaining lubrication. The cycle repeats until the thermostat cuts power when the target temperature is reached.

Compression Stroke
Engineering
Compressor Compression Stroke Workflow

03BOM & Weight Analysis

The following table outlines key parts, their materials, approximate weights, and functions derived from teardown data:

Assembly-wise Weight Distribution

The refrigerator assembly contributes 90.3% of total weight, confirming that most material cost is concentrated in the core cabinet, liner, doors, and internal hardware. Packaging alone accounts for 9.5% of the total weight (3.18 kg), which is non-functional mass used purely for protection and logistics - highlighting a potential area for optimization. Accessories are negligible at 0.2%, indicating minimal impact on both cost and weight.

Assembly Weight
Data Analysis
Assembly-wise Weight Distribution

Part Count Distribution

The BOM contains nearly 500 individual parts, showing high assembly complexity. Fabrication --- Sheet Metal (P) and Mechanical BOPs dominate the part count with 193 and 160 parts respectively, forming the structural backbone and functional mechanisms of the refrigerator. All other categories like injection moulding, wiring harnesses, connectors, and packaging occur in small counts.

Part Count 1
Data Analysis
Category-wise Part Count (Chart 1)
Part Count 2
Data Analysis
Category-wise Part Count (Chart 2)

Weight Distribution by Manufacturing Category

  • Fabrication --- Sheet Metal (P): 10,672.31g (47.4%) --- single largest contributor
  • Foam Moulding (P): 4,790g (21.3%) --- significant insulation weight
  • Injection Moulding (P): 2,887.37g (12.8%) --- plastic housing and structural parts
  • Paper Packaging (LA) + Vacuum Forming (P): 4,330g (19.2%) --- substantial non-functional weight
  • Fabrication --- Sheet Metal (LA): 1,160.53g (5.2%)
  • Fe Casting (P): 904g (4%) | Glass Moulding (P): 877g (3.9%)
Weight Dist 1
Data Analysis
Category-wise Weight Distribution (Chart 1)
Weight Dist 2
Data Analysis
Category-wise Weight Distribution (Chart 2)

04Should Cost Analysis

A detailed should cost analysis approach was used to estimate the manufacturing cost. Key assumptions:

  • The refrigerator is manufactured in India
  • Annual production volume of 40,000 units was considered
  • Material and labor cost benchmarks for Q1 FY25---26 were used

Bought-Out Parts Analysis

Bought-out parts are light in weight but cost-sensitive. Electronics (PCB and controls), mechanical BOPs, and refrigerant fluid are the primary cost drivers. Smaller items like connectors, bolts, and consumables contribute negligible weight and cost. This mismatch between low mass and high cost underscores the need for careful sourcing and supplier management in bought-out categories.

Bought Out
Supply Chain
Bought-Out Parts Analysis

Detailed Should Cost Analysis

Fabrication --- sheet metal and foam moulding dominate both weight and cost. At the same time, wiring harnesses, rubber parts, and PCB show high cost despite low weight.

Detailed Cost Analysis
Should Cost
Detailed Cost Analysis Analysis
Weight vs Cost
Should Cost
Weight vs Cost Analysis
xcPEP
xcPEP Platform
xcPEP Should Cost Platform View

Insights Gained from the Teardown

Bought-out parts such as electronic controls and refrigerant fluid add critical functionality while accounting for a notable share of cost.

Should-Cost Summary

The should cost analysis study for the Refrigerator considers production scale, process requirements, and prevailing material and labor benchmarks. The cost structure is distributed as follows:

  • Raw Materials: ?4,760.20 (47%) --- Primary contributor, driven by metals, plastics, and insulation foams
  • Bought-Out Parts: ?854.90 (8%) --- Electronics, refrigerant fluid, and mechanical assemblies
  • Processes: ?1,505.00 (15%) --- Fabrication-sheet metal, moulding, and assembly operations
  • Overheads: ?3,102.10 (30%) --- Indirect manufacturing costs, logistics, and facility expenses

Total Estimated Should-Cost: ?10,222.20 per unit (India, 40k units/year)

This breakdown highlights a material-intensive cost structure, with raw materials and overheads together accounting for more than three-fourths of the total manufacturing cost.

Should Cost
Should Cost
Total Should Cost Breakdown

Key Insights:

  • Fabrication --- Sheet Metal (P) and Foam Moulding (P) together account for nearly 69% of total weight and a large share of cost
  • Rubber seals, wiring harnesses, and PCBs are lightweight yet carry disproportionately high costs
  • Packaging materials contribute nearly 9.5% of total weight but relatively little to cost
  • The compressor, cost analysis ?2,077.15, is the most expensive component - the single largest cost driver
  • High part count (~500) increases assembly complexity, driving handling, tooling, and process overheads

Summary Table: BOM and Should-Cost Overview

Summary: Production Volume: 40,000 units/year (India) | Total Weight: ~33.42 kg | Should-Cost: ?10,222.20 per unit | Major Cost Drivers: Compressor (?2,077.15), cabinet foam, and door panel

Conclusion: Refrigerator Cost Drivers & Sourcing Insights

This refrigerator teardown highlights the balance between heavy structural processes and lightweight but high-value components. Through BOM analysis and should-cost benchmarking, manufacturers can identify material-intensive categories, optimize sourcing of bought-out parts, and explore opportunities in packaging and assembly simplification.